19 - 11 - 2017 | 13:53
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Publications Vietnamese Publications Dark cloud caused by China’s oil rig may have a silver lining

Dark cloud caused by China’s oil rig may have a silver lining

E-mail Print PDF

A legally binding end to China’s nebulous and maritime claims in these areas would bring enormous clarity, stability and security to at least two thirds of the area that is currently covered by China’s ominous U-shaped line, and could also have positive effects on the Paracels area.

alt

China’s deployment of the $1-billion Haiyang 981 oil rig in waters near the disputed Paracels on May 2, 2014 has sparked the most serious confrontation in the South China Sea since that country’s seizure of Johnson South Reef in the Spratlys in 1988, in which over 70 Vietnamese sailors were killed.

The current confrontation has been going on for three weeks without any sign of ending soon, with China’s Coast Guard vessels ramming Vietnam’s Marine Police and Fishery Control vessels, wounding several Vietnamese personnel. China’s flotilla vastly outnumbers the Vietnamese one, and its ships are faster and bigger, but the Vietnamese are persisting tenaciously. On land, anti-China demonstrations in Vietnam have spilled over into arson against factories, causing injuries and the death of at least three Chinese — although the situation has been brought under control.

However, these dark clouds of confrontation and violence might have a silver lining.

The key to this is on the other side of the South China Sea, where the Philippines is suing China over the Spratlys and Scarborough areas for violation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The main obstacle for the Philippines’ case is that China has taken advantage of Article 298 of the Convention to declare that it would not accept the compulsory dispute settlement procedure for several categories of disputes, including crucially the interpretation and application of Article 74 for matters relating to maritime delimitation. Under Article 74, a tribunal would most likely award the Philippines a large proportion of its claims. Without this article, these claims depend on the application of Article 121(3) to determine if any of the Spratly features, not just those cited in the proceedings, is entitled to an exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and it is not clear cut which way the tribunal will rule. If it does not rule in the Philippines’ favor, the case will have to go to a conciliation commission, entailing a lengthy process, the result of which is not legally binding.

So far, Vietnam’s view on the Philippines’ legal submission is unclear. Although Vietnam has been supporting the Philippines’ legal action against China as a matter of principle, and it has reserved its right to participate in the court case, it has not confirmed officially whether it takes the view that none of the Spratly features is entitled to EEZ, which, as indicated above, the Philippines’ case depends on. Perhaps, at least until recently, the Vietnamese policy makers have not made up their minds on the question of EEZ entitlement for the Spratly features. If Vietnam considered that the Spratlys have EEZ, it might submit an opposition to the Philippines’ claims. That would make it difficult for the tribunal to award them to the Philippines because Vietnam is not properly presented in the legal proceedings.

China’s deployment of its giant oil rig within Vietnam’s claimed EEZ has certainly had the effect of pushing Vietnam and the Philippines closer to each other. The Philippine President’s statement of condemnation of China is an unprecedented act of support from one ASEAN country to another, and most likely suggests a policy of future co-operation between the Philippines and Vietnam in the South China Sea disputes.

But there might be another, less visible but far-reaching effect.

The current confrontation might be a wake-up call for Vietnamese policy makers to come down from their fence and support the view that none of the disputed features in the South China Sea is entitled to an EEZ. The confrontation over Haiyang 981 might convince them that in reality EEZ entitlement for disputed islands does more harm than good to Vietnam.

The combination of these two effects would mean that Vietnam will not submit an opposition to the Philippines claims based on the view that the Spratlys might be entitled to EEZ. That would eliminate a significant risk for the Philippines’ case. Vietnam might even submit a support for the Philippines’ view that none of the Spratlys features is entitled to an EEZ, which might possibly help to nudge the ruling to go in the Philippines’ favor.

The confrontation and violence coming from China’s deployment of the Haiyang 981 oil rig at its current position should also serve as a stark reminder to the tribunal arbitrating the Philippines-China arbitration case. If this tribunal were to rule that some features in the Spratlys might be entitled to an EEZ, then, with China’s rejection of arbitration for matters relating the equitable delimitation of EEZ and bona fide co-operation required by Article 74, that country would continue to violate this article with immunity. That would condemn the South China Sea to increasing turmoil, confrontations, and the threat and use of force, possibly ending with China managing to use its sheer strength to impose its will on the other littoral states.

If these factors help the tribunal’s ruling to go in the Philippines favor, it would be absolutely disastrous for China’s maritime claims. In one fell swoop, the pretense of legality for most of China’s maritime claims in the southern and eastern parts of the South China Sea would be swept away by an international tribunal’s ruling. What’s more, that ruling would be legally binding for China. A legally binding end to China’s nebulous and maritime claims in these areas would bring enormous clarity, stability and security to at least two thirds of the area that is currently covered by China’s ominous U-shaped line, and could also have positive effects on the Paracels area.

Dr. Huy Duong is an analyst on the disputes in the South China Sea Sea. This article was originally published on The Manila Times.


Newer news items:
Older news items:

Comments  

 
0 #1 Dark cloud caused by China’s oil rig may have a silver liningEvie 2017-07-29 11:15
I see you don't monetize your blog, don't waste your traffic, you can earn extra bucks every month because you've got hi quality content.
If you want to know what is the best adsense alternative,
search in google: Mertiso's tips

Here is my web-site; 86King: https://iamHildegarde.blogspot.com
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

China's 2017 fishing ban a threat to maritime rule-based order

China's 2017 fishing ban a threat to maritime rule-based order

China's 2017 fishing moratorium constitutes a severe violation of UNCLOS, which accords all the countries sovereign rights and jurisdiction over their Exclusive Economic Zones. 

Read more...

Law of the Sea Ruling Reveals Dangerous Chinese Nationalism

Law of the Sea Ruling Reveals Dangerous Chinese Nationalism

The recent ruling by a United Nation Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Arbitration Tribunal of the on a case brought by the Philippines against China has been welcomed by many governments that are concerned about rising tensions in the South China Sea. However, within China it has provoked outpourings of defiance.

Read more...

A fair and effective code of conduct for the South China Sea

A fair and effective code of conduct for the South China Sea

Some people could blame on the DOC's weaknesses when they look at current picture of the South China Sea which is painted with distrust and tensions. The region is in need of having an effective documnent, so-called COC. Yet, what are elements that should be included?

Read more...

US analysis of China’s nine-dash line is correct

US analysis of China’s nine-dash line is correct

Historic fishing activities by the peoples around the South China Sea in what was at that time international waters cannot give China the right to fish in other countries’ EEZs today.

Read more...

South China Sea Disputes: Facts or Fiction?

South China Sea Disputes: Facts or Fiction?

If a country cites international law to justify its position while avoiding having that position tested in court, such use of international law is just rhetoric, and does not deserve support from scholars.

Read more...

Chinese Offshore Oil Company Fuels South China Sea Tension

Chinese Offshore Oil Company Fuels South China Sea Tension

CNOOC is using Western technology to further Chinese territorial claims.

Read more...

South China Sea disputes: Chinese historical evidence found wanting

South China Sea disputes: Chinese historical evidence found wanting

“Historical evidences” of some Chinese scholars are vague, erroneous or blatantly false, relying as they do on uncorroborated evidence, faulty logic, misquotes, misinterpretations and outright inventions.

Read more...

One confrontation, three legal questions

One confrontation, three legal questions

“Is Vietnam or China legally right in this confrontation?”: According to UNCLOS as has been interpreted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the answer is definitely Vietnam, regardless of the answers to the first two questions.

Read more...

New ten-dashed line map revealed China’s ambition

New ten-dashed line map revealed China’s ambition

Deliberately and desperately applying irrelevant concepts and provisions of UNCLOS will not create the legal basis for the nine dashed line claim.

Read more...

South China Sea: Rightness is mightness, not vice versa

South China Sea: Rightness is mightness, not vice versa

The oil-rig incident is a reminder to China that mightiness does not bring rightness, it is the other way around.

Read more...

Exposing China’s Artificial Islands Plan in the Spratly’s

Exposing China’s Artificial Islands Plan in the Spratly’s

Rather than dismissing the concerns of its neighbors as part of a political conspiracy, China should come to understand how its own actions contribute to the perception of a Chinese threat, as evident in its plan to construct artificial islands in the Spratly Archipelago.

Read more...

New tensions in the South China Sea

New tensions in the South China Sea

China is not conducting the activities of oil rig within its right and its illegal aggressive action is affecting stability and peaceful environment in the whole region.

Read more...

South China Sea & China's Grand Chessboard

South China Sea & China's Grand Chessboard

China has thrown a ball in to the U.S. court, and it is up to the U.S. to respond firmly.

Read more...

The Paracels: Forty Years On

The Paracels: Forty Years On

China’s act of locating its oil rig in contested waters in the Paracels is more than a dispute over sovereignty. It is also a dispute about international law of the sea.

Read more...

The Paracels: Does China have ‘undisputed sovereignty’?

The Paracels: Does China have ‘undisputed sovereignty’?

China should admit that sovereignty over the Paracels is disputed and withdraw its oil rig from its current location because any drilling that causes permanent change to the seabed in the disputed water is not allowed under international law.

Read more...

The danger of convoluting everything into sovereignty disputes

The danger of convoluting everything into sovereignty disputes

Much of the tensions in the South China Sea could be resolved by applying UNCLOS’s dispute settlement procedure to matters relating to maritime delimitation and cooperation in disputed areas.

Read more...

Sovereignty over Paracels: Article Lets Off Beijing Lightly

Sovereignty over Paracels: Article Lets Off Beijing Lightly

Bateman states that "a negotiated maritime boundary in this area would likely place the rig within China’s EEZ even if reduced weight was given to China’s claimed insular features". A careful analysis suggests just the opposite.

Read more...

Dark cloud caused by China’s oil rig may have a silver lining

Dark cloud caused by China’s oil rig may have a silver lining

A legally binding end to China’s nebulous and maritime claims in these areas would bring enormous clarity, stability and security to at least two thirds of the area that is currently covered by China’s ominous U-shaped line, and could also have positive effects on the Paracels area.

Read more...

Haiyang 981: From Water Cannons to Court?

Haiyang 981: From Water Cannons to Court?

A dangerous clash has flared up between Vietnam and China over the latter’s deployment of an oil rig near the disputed Paracels. One option for Vietnam is to submit the dispute to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea’s (UNCLOS) compulsory dispute settlement procedure.

Read more...

Reassurance needed, unlikely over the Nine-Dash Line

Reassurance needed, unlikely over the Nine-Dash Line

What would reassure neighbouring nations is for China to bring their claims into the realm of international law and reasonableness. China should be prepared to negotiate in good faith the limits of the disputed area.

Read more...
More:

Language

South China Sea Studies

Joomla Slide Menu by DART Creations

Special Publication

 

Search

Login Form

Subscribe form

Top Photo Galleries

Web Links

VIETNAM MOFA SPOKESPERSON

 

NATIONAL BOUNDARIES